IEECAS OpenIR  > 黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室(2010~)
Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review
Chow,J.C(Chow,Judith C.)[1,2,3]; Lowenthal,DH(Lowenthal, Douglas H.)[1,3]; Chen,L.W.A(Chen,L.W.Antony)[1,4]; Wang,XL(Wang,Xiaoliang)[1,3]; Watson, J G.(Watson, John G.)[1,2,3]
Source PublicationAir Quality, Atmosphere & Health

Major components of suspended particulate matter (PM) are inorganic ions, organic matter (OM), elemental carbon (EC), geological minerals, salt, non-mineral elements, and water. Since oxygen (O) and hydrogen (H) are not directly measured in chemical speciation networks, more than ten weighting equations have been applied to account for their presence, thereby approximating gravimetric mass. Assumptions for these weights are not the same under all circumstances. OM is estimated from an organic carbon (OC) multiplier (f) that ranges from 1.4 to 1.8 in most studies, but f can be larger for highly polar compounds from biomass burning and secondary organic aerosols. The mineral content of fugitive dust is estimated from elemental markers, while the water-soluble content is accounted for as inorganic ions or salt. Part of the discrepancy between measured and reconstructed PM mass is due to the measurement process, including: (1) organic vapors adsorbed on quartz-fiber filters; (2) evaporation of volatile ammonium nitrate and OM between the weighed Teflon-membrane filter and the nylon-membrane and/or quartz-fiber filters on which ions and carbon are measured; and (3) liquid water retained on soluble constituents during filter weighing. The widely used IMPROVE equations were developed to characterize particle light extinction in U.S. national parks, and variants of this approach have been tested in a large variety of environments. Important factors for improving agreement between measured and reconstructed PM mass are the f multiplier for converting OC to OM and accounting for OC sampling artifacts.

KeywordPm2.5 Mass Closure Chemical Speciation Organic Matter Sampling Artifact
Indexed BySCI
Citation statistics
Cited Times:94[WOS]   [WOS Record]     [Related Records in WOS]
Document Type期刊论文
Affiliation1.Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute,Reno, NV 89512, USA;
2.The State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology,Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Xi’an, Shaanxi 710075, China;
3.Graduate Faculty, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89503, USA;
4.Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Universityof Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
Chow,J.C,Lowenthal,DH,Chen,L.W.A,et al. Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review[J]. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health,2015,8(3):243-263.
APA Chow,J.C,Lowenthal,DH,Chen,L.W.A,Wang,XL,&Watson, J G..(2015).Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review.Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health,8(3),243-263.
MLA Chow,J.C,et al."Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review".Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 8.3(2015):243-263.
Files in This Item:
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
Mass reconstruction (538KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取CC BY-NC-SAApplication Full Text
Related Services
Recommend this item
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Chow,J.C(Chow,Judith C.)[1,2,3]]'s Articles
[Lowenthal,DH(Lowenthal, Douglas H.)[1,3]]'s Articles
[Chen,L.W.A(Chen,L.W.Antony)[1,4]]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[Chow,J.C(Chow,Judith C.)[1,2,3]]'s Articles
[Lowenthal,DH(Lowenthal, Douglas H.)[1,3]]'s Articles
[Chen,L.W.A(Chen,L.W.Antony)[1,4]]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[Chow,J.C(Chow,Judith C.)[1,2,3]]'s Articles
[Lowenthal,DH(Lowenthal, Douglas H.)[1,3]]'s Articles
[Chen,L.W.A(Chen,L.W.Antony)[1,4]]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.